In October 2001, when Congress passed the Patriot Act — and again when it reauthorized it in 2006 — the Bush administration assured nervous but compliant members of Congress that these expanded domestic surveillance tools were needed to protect the homeland. Bush partisans scoffed at critics who worried these new spy powers might be used for nefarious political purposes. After… return to article
-
subscribe to print magazine
-
email this article to a friend
-
Reader Comments (2)Page 1 of 1 pagesOne thing I’d like to do is to push Hillary and Barack and John into a corner and get straight from their mouths what exactly they plan to do about that horrorshow law, that truncator of constitutional protections, that ocean of fascistic possibilities, known far and wide as the USA PATRIOT Act. A newspeak-named assault on the whole idea of rights, I say. I’ve been in hate with the mf’n thing from the second I heard of it.
I doubt if any one of them would give me anything but a canned, suck-up answer. I’d love to be proven wrong.
First it was 9/11 and then that monstrosity, all within about a month. Talk about your 1-2 punch! It about made me cry. I remember REAL clear.
Damn that f’d-up law for the piece of misdirection that it is, as if the world is any safer from violent extremists by us dropping protections against overweaning government power. As if half-erasing the Bill of Rights is necessary to get FBI and CIA to communicate effectively. It’s a goddamn shame.
Focus on the police work, drop the primate territoriality among police and intelligence agencies, and leave the constitutional rights in place, unmolested.
You didn’t buy that bullshit line that “we’re too free” did you? Like WTC 1, 2 and 7 collapsed because we’re too free?? Tsk tsk. Snap out of it.
John? Hillary? Barack? Whoever of you takes the Oval Office. Burn that law. Order the agencies to get their acts together, fire the directors who fail to make sure it happens, and burn that stinking law! Your place in history will be golden.
Posted by Kuya on Apr 24, 2008 at 10:05 PM Wow Joel, your article was only on the front e-page for a day or so, got archived almost immediately while older articles stayed up front. Almost as if my perfectly correct and entirely legal expression of political opinion DQ’d it.
Sorry about that.
Well, sorry the editorial decision went the way it did, especially since your article helps point up the questionability of the law and how it gets used.
Not sorry at all about my take on the USA PATRIOT Act.
Here are 3 links to the parts of a documentary you all may find interesting, entitled “Unconstitutional: The War On Civil Liberties.”
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gu6ZBY08M38Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqfE0dg7z_sPart 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bcg1W48v0qoEvery square inch of the United States of America is a free-speech zone! Dont forget that.
Posted by Kuya on Apr 29, 2008 at 8:24 PM Page 1 of 1 pages -
register a new account »Posting Security
Also by Joel Bleifuss
- Keep the Heat on Obama
- EPA on Trial
- Bush’s Selective Mourning
- Piling it High
The sewage sludge industry meets the light of day - Political Vice Squad
- Red-Boating Obama
Popular Discussions
- The 9/11 Faith Movement
Many Americans believe 9/11 was a conspiracy by the U.S. government
1968 posts since Jul 11 06 - What’s the 411 on 9/11?
891 posts since Dec 21 05 - Democrats: It’s the War
659 posts since Nov 1 05 - Was the Presidential Election Stolen?
459 posts since Jun 19 06 - A Fundamental History Lesson
The rise of National Socialism proved politics and religion don't mix
426 posts since Oct 10 05
© 2008 In These Times | Reprint Policy | Privacy Policy | Powered by Expression Engine | RSS Feeds
