Help In These Times Survive the Recession and Reach Its 33rd Year! Please Donate Today.

Member Profile

jds2006

Latest Comments view all 1

    • 24 Sep 06
    • 1:45 pm

    Wrong, jackomarsh. Technical plagiarism is as damaging as intentional plagiarism. We have to be able to read a writer without wondering how sloppy or diligent--or how dishonest or honest--she is, else the balance of the reader/writer economy slip in the writer's favor and the reader always fear that errors (sloppy or dishonest) enter the transaction. On the other hand, the photograph is indeed too much.

    Posted to Plagiarists: Catch Your Own Clue