In These Times

Latest Comments view all 2

• • 01 Dec 06
  • 3:16 pm

  “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” Yeah but you need evidence to invade a sovereign country. Does every country in the world have to prove that they don't have WMDs to our satisfaction or face invasion ? We have a lot of invading to do! Maher has credibility, Rumsfeld does not. Maher is not sending our soldiers to die for an illegal war without a plan; Rumsfeld is. It's these kinds of word games they play to draw attention away from their crimes. You can call it liberal bias if you want. It doesn't make it so. It was …

  Posted to Live At Your Own Risk

• • 10 Dec 06
  • 7:53 am

  "In a sandbox the size of Iraq anything could be hidden. The U.S. may have prevented future attacks since 9/11 — or the terrorists could have planned to wait until we are all at odds with each other over here. (In which case it is working just fine.) Whoever they are, or wherever, they are not stupid." Talk about words games. You take the cake dude. We could stay at perpetual war for nothing by your logic. Our young soldiers are dying for what WE KNOW were lies and you still want to play word games like the BushCo coward draft …

  Posted to Live At Your Own Risk