In the Belly of the Beast.
In These Times blogs live from the Republican National Convention September 1 - 4.
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > November 18, 2004

Take a Breath

By Joel Bleifuss

No doubt, some of you are thinking, “This loss may not be the end of the world, but I can see it from here.” Look again.

George W. Bush’s reelection signifies defeat only if one defines victory as winning this election, or any other. Of course, if progressives are ever to govern—create a more just society through exercising legislative control—they must first win elections. But electoral victories are not the starting point; rather, they are the natural outcome of successful political organization.

By that measure, progressives succeeded in 2004. An anti-Bush movement coalesced outside of the Democratic National Committee and its conservative surrogate, the Democratic Leadership Council. For the first time in recent history, progressives established viable national political groups like internet powerhouse MoveOn, coalition-built 527s like Americans Coming Together, and independent political initiatives like Howard Dean’s Democracy for America. The results, including John Kerry’s vote total (he recieved the second most votes of any presidential candidate in history), were impressive.

The last time a political campaign mobilized the progressive electorate was in 1988, when Jesse Jackson sought the Democratic nomination. Millions of voters rallied around his Rainbow Coalition banner, but no lasting political organization was built. Jackson dropped the ball, progressives failed to pick it up and the movement dissipated.

There were lessons to be learned then, as there are lessons to be learned today.

The 2004 election proved that the Democratic Party needs leaders—not poll-driven consultants, who too often sacrifice principle for what appears expedient.

For example, Kerry voted for Bush’s Iraq war resolution, following the “guidance” offered by Democracy Corps, a non-profit “dedicated to making the government of the United States more responsive to the American people.”

On October 3, 2002, prior to the Iraq war resolution votes, Democracy Corps (founded in 1999 by James Carville, Stan Greenberg and Bob Shrum) advised Capitol Hill Democrats: “This decision [to support or oppose an Iraq war resolution] will take place in a setting where voters, by 10 points, prefer to vote for a member who supports a resolution to authorize force (50 to 40 percent).”

Imagine if Kerry and the 109 other Democrats in the House and Senate had voted against Bush’s plans for war. The national media would have been forced to take notice and there would have been a vital public debate over invading Iraq.

Then there is the question of “values.” Kerry was right to ignore Bill Clinton’s advice that he endorse the 11 anti-gay ballot measures, but he could have attracted values voters by running as an unabashed populist. Writing in the New York Times, Tom Frank put it this way:

To short-circuit the Republican appeals to blue-collar constituents, Democrats must confront the cultural populism of the wedge issues with genuine economic populism. They must dust off their own majoritarian militancy instead of suppressing it; sharpen the distinctions between the parties instead of minimizing them; emphasize the contradictions of culture-war populism instead of ignoring them; and speak forthrightly about who gains and who loses from conservative economic policy.

That’s good advice, but will the Democratic establishment follow it? As “New” Democrats in Washington rush to imbue the party with “values,” progressives would do well to heed MoveOn.org, which sent its millions of members this post-election advice: “Our journey toward a progressive America has always been bigger than George Bush. The current leg is just beginning—we’re still learning how to build a citizen-based politics together. … Today, we’ll take a breath. Tomorrow, we’ll keep moving toward the America we know is possible.”

Joel Bleifuss is the editor of In These Times, where he has worked as an investigative reporter, columnist and editor since 1986. Bleifuss has had more stories on Project Censored's annual list of the “10 Most Censored Stories” than any other journalist.

More information about Joel Bleifuss
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    PRINCIPLES!!

    Gee, what a concept.

    The Republicans may have TWISTED principles...but they have principles...and they stick to them.

    The Dems have lost direction. They’ve lost a base that should have been theirs forever. WORKERS (make the minimum wage a RED, WHITE and BLUE issue), MINORITIES (didya see the Hispanic vote? We need to reach that base that is conservative on religion...and loves strength), WOMEN (less talk of abortion...more talk on childcare, more talk on working women, more talk on wage disparity).

    The Dems do not need to become Republican LITE.

    Posted by Liberal AND Proud on Nov 18, 2004 at 11:25 AM

    on the other side of the coin repuclicans think that democrats have twisted principles. Maybe you need to shoot the messenger for a change!metaphorically speaking of course. seriously maybe your principles are not(all ) wrong but how you present them and who presents them IS wrong. You don’t just give somebody corn to eat you show them how to plant and grow corn and youdo it in a way that does not make them feel stupid for not knowing how to grow corn. I am a conservative( mostly) and I get angry when I hear you (progressives) demean my intelligence, my faith, my core beliefs. I don’t want to hate you any more than probably you want to hate me but that’s what it’s come too unfortunately. Maybe we need to have a forum such as I hope this one is becoming ; to debate both sides politely and with some respect. I know on this forum I oft times have been troll like in my verbiage to my progressive friends and for that I am sorry. But do you think that an exclusive forum of just progressives serves your cause other than to have a general bitch session about the Conservatives??
    Let’s meet halfway- no swords- no clubs and debate some of the issues if you will only look past my LOUSY typing skills.

    Posted by redstate on Nov 18, 2004 at 1:56 PM

    What good is showing people how to grow corn if they can’t afford land?

    If you agree that there is a percentage of the population (and many of us fall in and out of that percentage from time to time) that simply hasn’t the resources and truly are classified as poor, and that those folks genuinely DO need government help. Then we have no argument between one another. We are simply NEGOTIATING the degree of help.

    Unfortunately, the Republicans and particularly the extreme right seem to hold personal responsibility above all else, including being born poor and or sick, handicapped, etc.

    THAT is my problem with them.

    They response is fairly close to Dickensian.

    “Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?

    Posted by Liberal AND Proud on Nov 18, 2004 at 2:42 PM

    This whole attitude of “every man for himself” is cold, callous and very unbecoming of a CIVILIZED nation.

    AND there is hypocrisy all around. The same “hard working, strong personal values” farmer that rails against the poor single mother as being a slacker...is also first in line to put his hand out to the government when his farm is in trouble.

    Posted by Liberal AND Proud on Nov 18, 2004 at 2:46 PM

    I have always found it an interesting paradox in values that the party that refutes/denies/hates Darwin’s theory of evolution embraces Darwinian economics.

    Posted by Constitution Is My Bible on Nov 18, 2004 at 3:39 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 51 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues

Also by Joel Bleifuss

Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of Rick Perlstein's new book Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America!

Popular Discussions