Views > June 20, 2006 > Web Only

Black Politics Paradigm Paradox

By Salim Muwakkil

Political pundits were ready to announce that black politics had reached an important milestone after Cory A. Booker won the mayor’s race in Newark, N.J., on May 9. The 37-year-old Booker defeated his chief rival by a margin of nearly 3 to 1. His victory is a generational change (the man he’s replacing is 70), but it also marked a change in the traditional line of political ascent and ideological allegiance.

Booker is a product of suburban privilege: He earned degrees from Stanford University and Yale Law School with a Rhodes scholarship in between. A former star athlete with a tall, athletic frame, the charismatic Booker has a comforting, cross-cultural manner. Without a political sponsor, he moved into Newark in 1996 and organized an active community group fighting for better city services. Two years later, he won a seat on the city council, serving from 1998 to 2002.

He ran for mayor in 2002, losing to incumbent mayor Sharpe James, who had served since 1986. An Oscar-nominated documentary, Street Fight, chronicled that abrasive campaign. In late March, James announced he would not run for a sixth term, allowing Booker’s well-financed campaign to roll over an under-funded substitute, Deputy Mayor Ronald L. Rice.

Booker amassed more than $5 million for his second run and his fundraising prowess is not hard to understand. Admiring articles about him have appeared in a number of major publications (including a Time magazine piece with a headline asking if Booker was “The Savior of Newark?”). Bankers and real estate moguls in Manhattan hosted fundraisers for him, celebrities have offered their support and he has drawn plaudits from a bipartisan chorus of politicians, pundits and activists.

His politics are a mixture of urban progressivism and New Democrat-style neoliberalism. He supports school vouchers for public schools and private sector approaches to some public problems, but he also stresses the need for affordable housing, universal medical care and for providing increased services to disadvantaged youth.

Many pundits list him with Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and U.S. Rep. and Senate candidate Harold Ford (D-Tenn.) as post-civil rights black politicians that bring heterodox (even heretical) ideas to government—a new paradigm, as they say.

But wait just a minute:

In June, former U.S. Rep. Ron Dellums was elected mayor of Oakland, Calif. Dellums is a 70-year-old veteran of the civil rights movement who served 27 years in Congress. After a laborious count of absentee and provisional ballots that lasted nearly two weeks, he captured more than 50 percent of the Oakland electorate and won the seat outright over his closest rival, City Council President Ignacio De La Fuenta.

An iconic progressive who represented the liberal East Bay during a contentious era, Dellums is defiantly old paradigm. He pushed hard to end the war in Vietnam and was one of the strongest congressional voices against South African apartheid.

Rather than focusing on specific solutions to Oakland’s problems, Dellums’ campaign stressed his government experiences, especially an ability to work with diverse groups. For example, although he vigorously opposed American militarism during his congressional tenure, he wound up as chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

Dellums forcefully articulated his goal for Oakland to become a model city with scant poverty and universal health care. He is hostile to educational vouchers and remains suspicious of the forces who have rushed to Booker’s support. The septuagenarian mayor noted his biggest change will be to increase the public’s role in running the city.

These contrasting political phenomena confound attempts to chart black politics as a linear progression.

Booker’s fresh face and energetic optimism bring new energy to Newark, a city ever on the verge of renaissance. I started my journalism career with the Newark bureau of the Associated Press, and I maintain an abiding interest in that bellwether city. Kenneth Gibson, elected in 1970 as the city’s first black mayor, gained national attention with the quip, “Wherever American cities are going, Newark will get there first.”

Gibson was right and wrong. The economic disinvestment and “white flight” that fueled Newark’s steady decline set a pattern widely replicated in much of urban America, including Oakland. But as other cities have been revitalized, New Jersey’s largest continues to languish. More than 25 percent of Newark’s 280,000 residents live below the poverty line amidst high rates of unemployment, crime and myriad other social dysfunctions.

But Booker’s quest for new approaches linked him with some disreputable forces; his affection for education vouchers, for example, allied him with the sinister Bradley Foundation, one of the main financial founts of neoconservatism and of hereditary writers like The Bell Curve author Charles Murray. Critics will be waiting for other signs of heresy. Supporters will trumpet Booker’s willingness to look for ideas “outside the box” of liberal orthodoxy.

Dellums, on the other hand, will probably work the liberal orthodoxy for all it’s worth, seeking government involvement in the unfinished quest for social justice. As a veteran progressive, Dellums understands that market-oriented solutions often clash with that quest.

Booker appears to believe the two approaches can be reconciled. Time will tell whether Booker is sincere in that belief and, if so, whether he’s right.

• subscribe to print magazine

  First Name Last Name Home Address City State Zip Code Email

  2-year, 24-issues, $44.95 1-year, 12-issue, $24.95

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Black or white who cares? When the politicians become corrupt - often by being bought off by special interests - we all suffer the loss of representation. To think that the color of ones skin is important is merely silly. (One might hope that class would be a better predictor, but even here we find that even the initially earnest can be bought - at discount prices no less.)

  Posted by wolf on Jun 20, 2006 at 8:35 AM

  Woof-woof, Wolf.

  When capital flight flees to the suburbs, or the exurbs, or out-of-stae, or out of the country, the people who can best afford to flee (the middle class, including the minority middle-class) will fly with it.  This normally results in a higher urban unemployment rate, a lower urban median income, a larger working-class population competing against one another for a shrinking employment base, a larger population of public education students less inclined or prepared to succeed in an academic or vocational market which rewards the children of the economic migrants who might have been otherwise inclined to employ or educate them, higher crime rates, lower literacy rates, increasing rates of drug addiction, alcoholism, child and spousal abuse, and a general deterioration of the social and individual welfare of the folks who are allowed to remain mired in their own misery.  And all of this occurs because the people who possess the capital are allowed to seek their own levels of profitability, regardless of the social consequences they create, which are either ignored or blamed on the people who are forced to suffer them.

  None of this is rocket science, Seymour.  Anyone, even someone with your own limited capacity to comprehend causal correlations, is capable of understanding it.

  Posted by Major Major on Jun 20, 2006 at 4:24 PM

  “someone with your own limited capacity” Is there any other kind of capacity? :)

  You’re funny! Have a good day, my friend.

  Posted by wolf on Jun 21, 2006 at 11:48 AM

  That a new school, prototype Black political “paradigm” would evolve before the demise of the old school civil rights era Black politicians makes sense and is in step with the overall retreat of “the people’s” influence in the U S political process.  Whether and how long they can co-exist is another matter.

  Posted by theloneous on Jun 21, 2006 at 12:05 PM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Member Login

Also by Salim Muwakkil

• Getting Messy With Jesse Helps Obama
  
• Chicago’s Olympic Dreams Undeserved
  
• Israel’s Openly Secret Nukes
  
• The Vendetta Against Black Men
  
• A Speech Even Condi Could Love
  
• The Man or the Movement